Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

wandaprint.com

Top-Rated New York Web Design Company & Digital Marketing Agency

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

158 ms

Resources Loaded

536 ms

Page Rendered

4.5 sec

About Website

Visit wandaprint.com now to see the best up-to-date Wandaprint content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wandaprint.com

We are consistently rated as one of the top digital agencies in the United States. Our website design and web marketing services are best-in-class.

Visit wandaprint.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wandaprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 158 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wandaprint.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

158 ms

gtm.js

83 ms

lazyload.min.js

14 ms

sbi-sprite.png

28 ms

Group-8.svg

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Wandaprint.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (158 ms) relates to the external source Maxburst.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (5%)

Content Size

19.0 MB

After Optimization

18.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Wandaprint.com main page is 19.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 18.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 252.8 kB

  • Original 307.4 kB
  • After minification 296.8 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 252.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 771.3 kB

  • Original 18.7 MB
  • After minification 17.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wandaprint images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (8%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

72

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wandaprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

wandaprint.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wandaprint.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wandaprint.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wandaprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wandaprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wandaprint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: