Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

wastewatch.org.uk

Waste Watch - Membership

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

62 ms

About Website

Welcome to wastewatch.org.uk homepage info - get ready to check Waste Watch best content right away, or after learning these important things about wastewatch.org.uk

Visit wastewatch.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Wastewatch.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wastewatch.org.uk performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wastewatch.org.uk

304 ms

wastewatch.org.uk

406 ms

members_on.gif

259 ms

global.css

307 ms

members_pages.gif

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Wastewatch.org.uk and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Wastewatch.org.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.7 kB (78%)

Content Size

15.0 kB

After Optimization

3.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Wastewatch.org.uk main page is 15.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 14.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 571 B

  • Original 889 B
  • After minification 728 B
  • After compression 318 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wastewatch.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 571 B or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (78%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waste Watch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wastewatch.org.uk accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

wastewatch.org.uk best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

wastewatch.org.uk SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wastewatch.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wastewatch.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Waste Watch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: