Access waterjet.ca. Waterjet Cutting - Waterloo, Ontario

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

waterjet.ca

131 ms

mysite_css.php

36 ms

sonar.css

32 ms

jquery.js

49 ms

accessible_menu_min.js

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Waterjet.ca, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (146 ms) belongs to the original domain Waterjet.ca.

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Waterjet.ca main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

Original 37.2 kB
After minification 35.6 kB
After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 184.5 kB

Original 2.4 MB
After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Waterjet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

Original 200.1 kB
After minification 200.1 kB
After compression 199.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 80 B

Original 515 B
After minification 515 B
After compression 435 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Waterjet.ca needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80 B or 16% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waterjet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.