Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

wdsign.com

nothing -

Page Load Speed

14.2 sec in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

14 sec

Page Rendered

66 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wdsign content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wdsign.com

CREATE Custom Specs for PROFESSIONALLY-DESIGNED BANNER IN A SECONDS and let us DESIGN IT for you! TRY EASY-TO-USE BANNER CREATION SYSTEM

Visit wdsign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wdsign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 14.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wdsign.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.2 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,750 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wdsign.com

76 ms

www.wdsign.com

1779 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

18 ms

main.min.css

38 ms

dashicons.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Wdsign.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Wdsign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 70.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

441.5 kB

After Optimization

371.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wdsign.com main page is 441.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 305.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 54.4 kB

  • Original 67.3 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 305.9 kB
  • After minification 305.9 kB
  • After compression 294.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 68.3 kB
  • After minification 68.3 kB
  • After compression 64.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wdsign.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (94%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wdsign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

wdsign.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wdsign.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wdsign.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wdsign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wdsign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: