603 ms in total
88 ms
327 ms
188 ms
Visit wearabletechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Wearable Techreview content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wearabletechreview.com
Are you about to buy technology that you wear? Before you do, watch our carefully curated review videos dedicated to wearable technology.
Visit wearabletechreview.comWe analyzed Wearabletechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 515 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Wearabletechreview.com rating and web reputation
wearabletechreview.com performance score
88 ms
75 ms
116 ms
111 ms
Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wearabletechreview.com, 50% (2 requests) were made to Cloudways-static-content.s3.amazonaws.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Cloudways-static-content.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (116 ms) relates to the external source Cloudways-static-content.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 122 B (34%)
363 B
241 B
In fact, the total size of Wearabletechreview.com main page is 363 B. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 363 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122 B or 34% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
2
2
The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wearable Techreview. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
wearabletechreview.com SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wearabletechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wearabletechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
{{og_description}}
wearabletechreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wearable Techreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: