Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

webfootretrievers.net

WEBFOOT RETRIEVERS - Retriever Training Bird Dog Spaniel Obedience Kennel South Carolina

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

606 ms

Page Rendered

863 ms

About Website

Welcome to webfootretrievers.net homepage info - get ready to check WEBFOOT RETRIEVERS best content right away, or after learning these important things about webfootretrievers.net

Retriever Training, Bird Dog Training, Pointer Training, Boykin Spaniel Training, English Labrador Retriever Puppies, Kennel, Ray Godwin, 803 496 3183

Visit webfootretrievers.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webfootretrievers.net page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webfootretrievers.net performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webfootretrievers.net

86 ms

index.html

61 ms

gdprscript.js

218 ms

sites.css

18 ms

fancybox.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Webfootretrievers.net, 63% (33 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) belongs to the original domain Webfootretrievers.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 201.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webfootretrievers.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 87.4 kB

  • Original 105.5 kB
  • After minification 104.5 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 110 B

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WEBFOOT RETRIEVERS images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 91.0 kB

  • Original 557.5 kB
  • After minification 507.6 kB
  • After compression 466.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.0 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 61.5 kB
  • After minification 58.4 kB
  • After compression 38.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webfootretrievers.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WEBFOOT RETRIEVERS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

webfootretrievers.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webfootretrievers.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

webfootretrievers.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webfootretrievers.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webfootretrievers.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of WEBFOOT RETRIEVERS. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: