Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

weblivelink.com

Home | Tiory

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

121 ms

About Website

Visit weblivelink.com now to see the best up-to-date Weblivelink content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weblivelink.com

Tiory Tenancy

Visit weblivelink.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Weblivelink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

weblivelink.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.196

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

weblivelink.com

1570 ms

landingpage-2.css

473 ms

landingpage2-responsive.css

412 ms

custom.css

412 ms

tabler-icons.min.css

438 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Weblivelink.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Weblivelink.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

335.1 kB

After Optimization

301.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Weblivelink.com main page is 335.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 209.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 26.2 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.9 kB, which is 61% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 209.6 kB
  • After minification 202.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weblivelink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 199 B

  • Original 68.5 kB
  • After minification 68.5 kB
  • After compression 68.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 30.8 kB
  • After minification 30.8 kB
  • After compression 27.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weblivelink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (67%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weblivelink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

weblivelink.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

weblivelink.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

weblivelink.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weblivelink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Weblivelink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weblivelink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: