Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

webpromoter.com

Promozione Siti Web:Posizionamento Motori di Ricerca Firenze,Toscana WebPromoter

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

130 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Promoter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webpromoter.com

WebPromoter è lo specialista nella promozione di siti turistici sui motori di ricerca e nel web marketing turistico a Firenze ed in Toscana.

Visit webpromoter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webpromoter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webpromoter.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webpromoter.com

51 ms

webpromoter.com

69 ms

www.webpromoter.com

3016 ms

style.css

47 ms

style.min.css

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Webpromoter.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Webpromoter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 480.5 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

601.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Webpromoter.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 659.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 59.7 kB

  • Original 77.0 kB
  • After minification 75.4 kB
  • After compression 17.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 132.9 kB
  • After minification 128.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Promoter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 235.0 kB

  • Original 659.7 kB
  • After minification 652.9 kB
  • After compression 424.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 235.0 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 181.6 kB

  • Original 212.7 kB
  • After minification 203.5 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webpromoter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 181.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (65%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Promoter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

webpromoter.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

webpromoter.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

webpromoter.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webpromoter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webpromoter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Promoter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: