Access webwhiteblue.org. Web White & Blue 2000 Evaluation Summary | Markle

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

webwhiteblue.org

97 ms

231-web-white-blue-2000-evaluation-summary

66 ms

471 ms

gtm.js

50 ms

style.min.css

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webwhiteblue.org, 78% (86 requests) were made to Ka-p.fontawesome.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Markle.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (471 ms) relates to the external source Markle.org.

Content Size

523.4 kB

After Optimization

429.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Webwhiteblue.org main page is 523.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 249.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

Original 55.6 kB
After minification 53.0 kB
After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

Original 7.4 kB
After minification 7.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web White Blue images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

Original 211.0 kB
After minification 211.0 kB
After compression 176.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

Original 249.5 kB
After minification 249.5 kB
After compression 234.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webwhiteblue.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web White Blue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.