Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

wem.technology

Home - Zhero

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

85 ms

About Website

Visit wem.technology now to see the best up-to-date Wem content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wem.technology

London's #1 end-to-end business Cyber Protection & IT Support for SMEs. Let Zhero handle getting you the top-notch IT solutions you deserve.

Visit wem.technology

Key Findings

We analyzed Wem.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wem.technology performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,350 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.977

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wem.technology

362 ms

www.zhero.co.uk

1362 ms

blocks-checkout.css

156 ms

swiper.min.css

228 ms

style.css

302 ms

Our browser made a total of 214 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wem.technology, 87% (186 requests) were made to Zhero.co.uk and 2% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Zhero.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 824.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wem.technology main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 380.2 kB

  • Original 443.7 kB
  • After minification 434.8 kB
  • After compression 63.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 380.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 284.0 kB

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wem images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 96.3 kB

  • Original 980.3 kB
  • After minification 980.3 kB
  • After compression 884.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 63.9 kB

  • Original 377.8 kB
  • After minification 377.6 kB
  • After compression 313.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wem.technology needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 143 (69%)

Requests Now

207

After Optimization

64

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 207 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 90 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 55 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

wem.technology accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wem.technology best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wem.technology SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wem.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wem.technology main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: