Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 47

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

whatcarreviews.com

日韩少妇无码中出,日韩 欧美 图套超市,制服丝袜亚洲日本高清,sis亚洲原创人生区征文,亚洲理论在线a中文字幕|人伦片无码中文字幕|婷婷色香五月图片小说|好紧好爽午夜视频,亚洲精品综合欧美一区二区三区,欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕二区,日韩高清亚洲日韩精品一区_国产av

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

954 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

240 ms

About Website

Visit whatcarreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Whatcarreviews content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whatcarreviews.com

日韩少妇无码中出,日韩 欧美 图套超市,制服丝袜亚洲日本高清,sis亚洲原创人生区征文,亚洲理论在线a中文字幕|人伦片无码中文字幕|婷婷色香五月图片小说|好紧好爽午夜视频,亚洲精品综合欧美一区二区三区,欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕二区,日韩高清亚洲日韩精品一区_国产av

Visit whatcarreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whatcarreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 954 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whatcarreviews.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.193

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whatcarreviews.com

954 ms

bootstrap.min.css

195 ms

fonts.min.css

134 ms

style.css

203 ms

css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Whatcarreviews.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (954 ms) belongs to the original domain Whatcarreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 443.1 kB (60%)

Content Size

733.1 kB

After Optimization

290.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Whatcarreviews.com main page is 733.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 304.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 79.4 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 154.7 kB
  • After minification 140.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whatcarreviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 198.7 kB

  • Original 304.6 kB
  • After minification 302.2 kB
  • After compression 106.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 163.4 kB

  • Original 194.4 kB
  • After minification 182.7 kB
  • After compression 31.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whatcarreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (26%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whatcarreviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whatcarreviews.com accessibility score

47

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

whatcarreviews.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

whatcarreviews.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whatcarreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Whatcarreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whatcarreviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: