Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

whoopingcough.net

Home page whooping cough

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

294 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Whooping Cough content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whoopingcough.net

Do you or your family have or suspect whooping cough? Sounds, videos. Symptoms. Treatment. Read the experiences of sufferers. Get advice.

Visit whoopingcough.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Whoopingcough.net page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whoopingcough.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.204

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whoopingcough.net

41 ms

whoopingcough.net

37 ms

981 ms

css

58 ms

210 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Whoopingcough.net, 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.wp.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (981 ms) belongs to the original domain Whoopingcough.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 92.1 kB (29%)

Content Size

319.4 kB

After Optimization

227.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Whoopingcough.net main page is 319.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 184.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 90.4 kB

  • Original 113.7 kB
  • After minification 111.4 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 20.9 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whooping Cough images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 184.8 kB
  • After minification 184.8 kB
  • After compression 183.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (73%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whooping Cough. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

whoopingcough.net accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

whoopingcough.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

whoopingcough.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whoopingcough.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whoopingcough.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whooping Cough. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: