Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

williamthomas.com

Custom Jewelry Handcrafted in Madison, WI | William Thomas

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

987 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

286 ms

About Website

Visit williamthomas.com now to see the best up-to-date William Thomas content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about williamthomas.com

Our award-winning design team specializes in handcrafted rings, earrings, pendants and necklaces loaded with diamonds, gemstones & self expression.

Visit williamthomas.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Williamthomas.com page load time and found that the first response time was 987 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

williamthomas.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.williamthomas.com

987 ms

7f03b56373f26252855b72d512439c81.css

256 ms

all.css

52 ms

foundation-icons.css

36 ms

hbf6ycs.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Williamthomas.com, 47% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 16% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (987 ms) belongs to the original domain Williamthomas.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 133.2 kB (51%)

Content Size

262.2 kB

After Optimization

129.0 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Williamthomas.com main page is 262.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 147.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 116.9 kB

  • Original 147.8 kB
  • After minification 147.6 kB
  • After compression 30.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 114.4 kB
  • After minification 114.4 kB
  • After compression 98.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Williamthomas.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (80%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

1

  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of William Thomas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

williamthomas.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

williamthomas.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

williamthomas.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Williamthomas.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Williamthomas.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of William Thomas. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: