Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

wintersmith.io

Wintersmith

Page Load Speed

453 ms in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

243 ms

Page Rendered

131 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wintersmith content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wintersmith.io

a flexible static site generator

Visit wintersmith.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Wintersmith.io page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 374 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wintersmith.io performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.335

34/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wintersmith.io

79 ms

site.css

15 ms

css

24 ms

analytics.js

7 ms

wintersmith.svg

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Wintersmith.io, 38% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (79 ms) belongs to the original domain Wintersmith.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.1 kB (61%)

Content Size

59.3 kB

After Optimization

23.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wintersmith.io main page is 59.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 6.3 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wintersmith. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

wintersmith.io accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

wintersmith.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

wintersmith.io SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wintersmith.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wintersmith.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wintersmith. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: