Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

wmairduct.com

wmairduct.com

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

804 ms

About Website

Visit wmairduct.com now to see the best up-to-date Wmairduct content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wmairduct.com

Visit wmairduct.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wmairduct.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wmairduct.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wmairduct.com

294 ms

wmairduct.com

225 ms

googleTagManager.js

112 ms

gmk2oqw.css

387 ms

main.css

378 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Wmairduct.com, 17% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (899 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.mouseflow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 60.0 kB (53%)

Content Size

113.8 kB

After Optimization

53.8 kB

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wmairduct.com main page is 113.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 68.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 261 B

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 45.2 kB
  • After compression 44.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 59.8 kB

  • Original 68.6 kB
  • After minification 58.7 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wmairduct.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (44%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wmairduct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

wmairduct.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

wmairduct.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wmairduct.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wmairduct.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wmairduct.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wmairduct. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: