Access wonderwebware.com. Web Design Tools

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,230 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.324

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

wonderwebware.com

103 ms

bootstrap-combined.min.css

46 ms

css.css

18 ms

shareaholic.js

21 ms

adsbygoogle.js

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Wonderwebware.com, 24% (17 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Content Size

977.1 kB

After Optimization

849.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Wonderwebware.com main page is 977.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 804.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 43.9 kB

Original 54.7 kB
After minification 47.9 kB
After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

Original 116.2 kB
After minification 91.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wonder Web Ware needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

Original 804.4 kB
After minification 804.4 kB
After compression 746.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

Original 1.9 kB
After minification 1.9 kB
After compression 814 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wonderwebware.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wonder Web Ware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.