Access woodmat.bg. УУДМАТ ЕООД | Начало | Качествените материали за мебелната пломишленост

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.25

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

woodmat.bg

361 ms

woodmat.bg

659 ms

css

31 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.css

220 ms

styles.min.css

459 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Woodmat.bg, 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (659 ms) belongs to the original domain Woodmat.bg.

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Woodmat.bg main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 77.4 kB

Original 87.1 kB
After minification 48.5 kB
After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.6 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Woodmat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 46 B

Original 121.2 kB
After minification 121.2 kB
After compression 121.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 64 B

Original 32.0 kB
After minification 32.0 kB
After compression 31.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Woodmat.bg has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Woodmat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.