Access woodmontstation.com. Apartments in Cranford NJ

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

woodmontstation.com

40 ms

www.woodmontstation.com

123 ms

www.woodmontstation.com

203 ms

jquery.min.js

39 ms

ajax.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Woodmontstation.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Spxeastwebfarm7.spherexx.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Textus.rentcafe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (255 ms) relates to the external source Spxeastwebfarm7.spherexx.com.

Content Size

306.9 kB

After Optimization

239.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Woodmontstation.com main page is 306.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 115.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

Original 54.6 kB
After minification 48.8 kB
After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

Original 106.8 kB
After minification 100.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Woodmont Station images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

Original 115.2 kB
After minification 115.1 kB
After compression 101.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

Original 30.3 kB
After minification 30.3 kB
After compression 24.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Woodmontstation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Woodmont Station. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.