Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

wraggwells.com

Well Drilling CT | Home Page | Wragg Wells Drilling

Page Load Speed

20 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

19.6 sec

Page Rendered

260 ms

About Website

Visit wraggwells.com now to see the best up-to-date Wragg Wells content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wraggwells.com

Wragg Wells Drilling is your well drilling CT expert providing both commercial and residential water wells, geothermal heat systems, hydro fracturing services & more!

Visit wraggwells.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wraggwells.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 19.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

wraggwells.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wraggwells.com

51 ms

untitled.css

4 ms

swfobject_modified.js

14 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

12 ms

anylinkcssmenu.css

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Wraggwells.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Otracking.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Adobe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.5 sec) relates to the external source Adobe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.1 kB (24%)

Content Size

232.6 kB

After Optimization

177.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Wraggwells.com main page is 232.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 168.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 17.6 kB
  • After minification 16.5 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 168.3 kB
  • After minification 163.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wragg Wells images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 40.9 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wraggwells.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (43%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wragg Wells. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wraggwells.com accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

wraggwells.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wraggwells.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wraggwells.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wraggwells.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wragg Wells. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: