Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 2

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

wrc.com

www.wrc.com | WRC.com® | FIA World Rally Championship | Official Website

Page Load Speed

777 ms in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

697 ms

Page Rendered

53 ms

About Website

Visit wrc.com now to see the best up-to-date WRC content for Kenya and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wrc.com

FIA World Rally Championship official website. Keep up-to-date with the latest news, rally results, WRC standings, calendar updates, video highlights and schedules from every rally. Watch the WRC live...

Visit wrc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wrc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 750 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wrc.com performance score

2

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,410 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.57

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wrc.com

27 ms

www.wrc.com

51 ms

gtm.js

602 ms

9.669bda2c.chunk.css

18 ms

main.803a0d89.chunk.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Wrc.com, 13% (1 request) were made to Qm.wrc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) relates to the external source Qm.wrc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.1 kB (1%)

Content Size

855.0 kB

After Optimization

849.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wrc.com main page is 855.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 801.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 8.1 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 58% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 174 B

  • Original 801.8 kB
  • After minification 801.8 kB
  • After compression 801.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 305 B

  • Original 45.1 kB
  • After minification 45.1 kB
  • After compression 44.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrc.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WRC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

wrc.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wrc.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wrc.com SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WRC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: