Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

xattenger.com

Francesco Orsi, Creative & Full Stack Developer

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

60 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xattenger content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xattenger.com

Francesco Orsi, Creative & Full Stack Developer, Award-winning UX Designer and Developer based in London

Visit xattenger.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xattenger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xattenger.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xattenger.com

60 ms

orsi.me

141 ms

js

65 ms

apple-icon-57x57.png

136 ms

apple-icon-60x60.png

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xattenger.com, 93% (25 requests) were made to Orsi.me and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Orsi.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.7 kB (15%)

Content Size

115.2 kB

After Optimization

97.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Xattenger.com main page is 115.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 101.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 101.1 kB
  • After minification 87.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xattenger needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xattenger. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

xattenger.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

xattenger.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

xattenger.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xattenger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xattenger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xattenger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: