Access xenna.com. Home | Xenna Corporation | Innovation in Personal Care

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

www.xenna.com

90 ms

minified.js

53 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

51 ms

polyfill.min.js

1180 ms

widget.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xenna.com, 40% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 24% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

551.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Xenna.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 516.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 412.6 kB

Original 516.4 kB
After minification 514.7 kB
After compression 103.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 412.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 54.1 kB

Original 220.1 kB
After minification 166.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xenna needs image optimization as it can save up to 54.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

Original 329.9 kB
After minification 329.9 kB
After compression 281.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xenna. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.