1.2 sec in total
47 ms
815 ms
313 ms
Visit xhtmlthis.com now to see the best up-to-date Xhtmlthis content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xhtmlthis.com
Looking for help to build, edit or fix your WordPress site? PixelPress is an easy, affordable way to get professional WordPress help!
Visit xhtmlthis.comWe analyzed Xhtmlthis.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
xhtmlthis.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.097
90/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
47 ms
162 ms
39 ms
25 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xhtmlthis.com, 68% (27 requests) were made to Pixelpress.co and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) relates to the external source Pixelpress.co.
Page size can be reduced by 229.1 kB (41%)
563.8 kB
334.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Xhtmlthis.com main page is 563.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 263.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 216.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 216.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xhtmlthis images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (86%)
35
5
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xhtmlthis. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
xhtmlthis.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xhtmlthis.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
xhtmlthis.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xhtmlthis.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xhtmlthis.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
xhtmlthis.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xhtmlthis. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: