4.2 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.7 sec
296 ms
Click here to check amazing Xopie content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xopie.com
Register Pending Delete Domains with Xopie: Capture Across Popular Catch Services, Manage Your Domains, and Join Web Auctions
Visit xopie.comWe analyzed Xopie.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xopie.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value16.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value4,180 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
1206 ms
649 ms
377 ms
632 ms
209 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xopie.com, 69% (29 requests) were made to Static.mintcdn.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Config1.veinteractive.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Xopie.com.
Page size can be reduced by 509.2 kB (60%)
847.6 kB
338.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Xopie.com main page is 847.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 610.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xopie images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 481.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 481.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (17%)
35
29
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xopie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
xopie.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xopie.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xopie.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
ES
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xopie.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Xopie.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
{{og_description}}
xopie.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xopie. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: