Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

xpressapp.com

Xpress® Framework - Web and Mobile Business Applications

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

462 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

397 ms

About Website

Welcome to xpressapp.com homepage info - get ready to check Xpress App best content for El Salvador right away, or after learning these important things about xpressapp.com

We develop web and mobile business applications. Tell us about your idea or requirement and we will make it a reality in an easy, fast and effective way!

Visit xpressapp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xpressapp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 462 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xpressapp.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xpressapp.com

462 ms

css

25 ms

css

47 ms

bootstrap.css

30 ms

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Xpressapp.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Xpressapp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 301.8 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Xpressapp.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 832.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 26.8 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 832.4 kB
  • After minification 830.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xpress App images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 266.4 kB

  • Original 540.1 kB
  • After minification 539.3 kB
  • After compression 273.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 266.4 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 130.9 kB
  • After minification 130.9 kB
  • After compression 121.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xpressapp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (62%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xpress App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

xpressapp.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

xpressapp.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xpressapp.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xpressapp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xpressapp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xpress App. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: