Access zoover.ro. Boek nu direct bij Zoover

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,420 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

www.zoover.ro

742 ms

comCombinedCSS.it92g.v112.css

267 ms

combinedHome.it92g.v112.css

182 ms

latest-viewed.it92g.v112.less

287 ms

jquery.min.js

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Zoover.ro, 8% (5 requests) were made to Ro.zooverresources.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (742 ms) belongs to the original domain Zoover.ro.

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

727.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Zoover.ro main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 808.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

Original 71.6 kB
After minification 71.4 kB
After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 105.4 kB

Original 543.8 kB
After minification 438.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zoover needs image optimization as it can save up to 105.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 560.4 kB

Original 808.6 kB
After minification 802.1 kB
After compression 248.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 560.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 65.1 kB

Original 89.8 kB
After minification 88.9 kB
After compression 24.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zoover.ro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zoover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.