Access zust.eu. Посредник в Германии - ZUST покупки в немецких магазинах

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.541

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

zust.eu

551 ms

zust.eu

762 ms

styles_site.css

198 ms

styles_icomoon.css

286 ms

captions.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Zust.eu, 2% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Bs.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Zust.eu.

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Zust.eu main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 155.0 kB

Original 167.5 kB
After minification 142.9 kB
After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

Original 3.8 MB
After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ZUST needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 672 B

Original 87.2 kB
After minification 87.2 kB
After compression 86.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

Original 63.7 kB
After minification 63.7 kB
After compression 55.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zust.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ZUST. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.