Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

baack.com

Baack.com - the most attractive cashback service available online featuring the best possible offers. Receive your cashback with Baack.com for purchas...

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

147 ms

baack.com screenshot

About Website

Visit baack.com now to see the best up-to-date Baack content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about baack.com

Spend and get your money back through a reliable cashback service Baack.com. Install an app to your browser and check your cashback directly on your favorite store's website. Baack.com – the best...

Visit baack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Baack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

baack.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.115

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

baack.com

62 ms

baack.com

460 ms

slick.css

52 ms

slick-theme.css

43 ms

style.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Baack.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (982 ms) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 165.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

675.4 kB

After Optimization

510.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Baack.com main page is 675.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 392.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 57.7 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 84.8 kB

  • Original 392.5 kB
  • After minification 307.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Baack needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 182.5 kB
  • After minification 182.5 kB
  • After compression 171.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 22.3 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Baack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Baack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

baack.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

baack.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

baack.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Baack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Baack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Baack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: