6 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.3 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Baby Care Journals content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about babycarejournals.com
Nurture. Love. Protect.
Visit babycarejournals.comWe analyzed Babycarejournals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
babycarejournals.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value4.9 s
64/100
10%
Value400 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.12
84/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
1542 ms
512 ms
508 ms
545 ms
511 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Babycarejournals.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Babycarejournals.com.
Page size can be reduced by 724.3 kB (25%)
2.9 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Babycarejournals.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Baby Care Journals images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 262.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 219.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babycarejournals.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 219.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (57%)
47
20
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Baby Care Journals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
babycarejournals.com
1542 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
512 ms
widget.css
508 ms
formidablepro.css
545 ms
style.css
511 ms
style.css
518 ms
bootstrap.min.css
616 ms
font-awesome.min.css
656 ms
css
25 ms
flexslider.css
658 ms
jquery.js
780 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
651 ms
modernizr.min.js
649 ms
bootstrap.min.js
736 ms
functions.min.js
741 ms
buttons.js
8 ms
flexslider.min.js
722 ms
flexslider-custom.js
719 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
707 ms
wp-embed.min.js
891 ms
ga.js
28 ms
__utm.gif
62 ms
babycarejournals-bg.png
449 ms
bcj-header1.jpg
459 ms
giving-birth-1024x576.jpg
454 ms
APGAR-Score-1024x683.jpg
453 ms
lactation-1024x466.jpg
459 ms
pregnancy-nutrition-1024x405.jpg
455 ms
potty-training-1024x453.jpg
454 ms
finding-right-pediatrician-1024x446.jpg
500 ms
baby-reflexes.jpg
916 ms
Newborns-Characteristics-300x240.jpg
458 ms
Baby-In-Pool-300x200.jpg
458 ms
what-is-gripe-water-1024x427.jpg
545 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
385 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
385 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
386 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
387 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
386 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
384 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
551 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
494 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
66 ms
getSegment.php
14 ms
checkOAuth.esi
4 ms
t.dhj
9 ms
t.dhj
10 ms
cm
45 ms
s-3271.xgi
21 ms
10 ms
hbpix
37 ms
7 ms
xrefid.xgi
10 ms
pixel
18 ms
pixel
16 ms
2981
25 ms
babycarejournals.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
babycarejournals.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
babycarejournals.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babycarejournals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Babycarejournals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
babycarejournals.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Baby Care Journals. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: