Tools & Wizards About Us
babyphonetest.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

babyphonetest.net

Babyphone Test 2012 / 2013 - Babyphone Siftung Warentest

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

410 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

146 ms

babyphonetest.net screenshot

About Website

Visit babyphonetest.net now to see the best up-to-date Babyphone Test content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about babyphonetest.net

Aktuelle Babyphone Testsieger sowie umfangreiche Testberichte 2012 / 2013. Jetzt Babyfon Test ansehen - großer Vergleich auf Babyphonetest.net.

Visit babyphonetest.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Babyphonetest.net page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

babyphonetest.net performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

babyphonetest.net

410 ms

www.babyphonetest.net

544 ms

mootools.js

131 ms

caption.js

291 ms

system.css

284 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Babyphonetest.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (544 ms) belongs to the original domain Babyphonetest.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.6 kB (16%)

Content Size

147.4 kB

After Optimization

123.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Babyphonetest.net main page is 147.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 55.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 55.3 kB
  • After minification 52.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Babyphone Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 51.4 kB
  • After minification 51.4 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babyphonetest.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babyphone Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

babyphonetest.net

babyphonetest.net

410 ms

www.babyphonetest.net

www.babyphonetest.net

544 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

131 ms

caption.js

caption.js

291 ms

system.css

system.css

284 ms

general.css

general.css

284 ms

addons.css

addons.css

301 ms

layout.css

layout.css

285 ms

template.css

template.css

301 ms

typo.css

typo.css

387 ms

ja.script.js

ja.script.js

380 ms

ja.ddmod.js

ja.ddmod.js

405 ms

css.css

css.css

482 ms

css.js

css.js

459 ms

white.css

white.css

493 ms

brand

brand

17 ms

brandjs.js

brandjs.js

18 ms

icon-min.gif

icon-min.gif

118 ms

icon-max.gif

icon-max.gif

117 ms

ga.js

ga.js

28 ms

header-subpage-bg.gif

header-subpage-bg.gif

150 ms

babyphone-test.png

babyphone-test.png

221 ms

mainnav-bg.gif

mainnav-bg.gif

204 ms

babyphone-testsieger.jpg

babyphone-testsieger.jpg

216 ms

button-produkt.jpg

button-produkt.jpg

147 ms

babyphone-test.jpg

babyphone-test.jpg

232 ms

babyphone-vergleich.jpg

babyphone-vergleich.jpg

277 ms

branding.png

branding.png

41 ms

mainnav-sep.gif

mainnav-sep.gif

244 ms

mainnav-active.gif

mainnav-active.gif

299 ms

mainnav-grad.gif

mainnav-grad.gif

300 ms

line-sep.gif

line-sep.gif

309 ms

bullet3.gif

bullet3.gif

313 ms

icon-marke.gif

icon-marke.gif

351 ms

icon-news.gif

icon-news.gif

377 ms

bullet7.gif

bullet7.gif

467 ms

hline.gif

hline.gif

501 ms

arrow2.png

arrow2.png

466 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

babyphonetest.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

babyphonetest.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

SEO Factors

babyphonetest.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babyphonetest.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Babyphonetest.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

babyphonetest.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Babyphone Test. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: