Tools & Wizards About Us
babysaying.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

babysaying.net

babysaying.net

Page Load Speed

19.4 sec in total

First Response

466 ms

Resources Loaded

18.7 sec

Page Rendered

248 ms

babysaying.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Babysaying content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about babysaying.net

上善若水~泽披万物

Visit babysaying.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Babysaying.net page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 18.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

babysaying.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

babysaying.net

466 ms

www.babysaying.me

1012 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

237 ms

bootstrap.min.css

769 ms

dmeng-2.0.9.5.css

706 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Babysaying.net, 73% (16 requests) were made to Babysaying.me and 9% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16 sec) relates to the external source Q.qlogo.cn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 315.4 kB (75%)

Content Size

420.4 kB

After Optimization

105.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Babysaying.net main page is 420.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 198.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 64.6 kB
  • After minification 62.5 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 16.1 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Babysaying needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 138.7 kB

  • Original 198.3 kB
  • After minification 193.7 kB
  • After compression 59.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 116.6 kB

  • Original 141.3 kB
  • After minification 139.7 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babysaying.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (32%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babysaying. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

babysaying.net

babysaying.net

466 ms

www.babysaying.me

www.babysaying.me

1012 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

237 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

769 ms

dmeng-2.0.9.5.css

dmeng-2.0.9.5.css

706 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1074 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

675 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

780 ms

dmeng-2.0.9.5.js

dmeng-2.0.9.5.js

739 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

884 ms

wordpress_32x32.png

wordpress_32x32.png

235 ms

qq_32x32.png

qq_32x32.png

240 ms

grey.png

grey.png

227 ms

qrcode.png

qrcode.png

229 ms

hm.js

hm.js

11607 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

441 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

524 ms

2b9faa5d6862b4f92debaa1ecbba14c0

2b9faa5d6862b4f92debaa1ecbba14c0

163 ms

100

100

15963 ms

40241b02b88248f294cb6aa3e8a0468d

40241b02b88248f294cb6aa3e8a0468d

170 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

516 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

1438 ms

SEO Factors

babysaying.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babysaying.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that Babysaying.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

babysaying.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Babysaying. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: