Tools & Wizards About Us
babytravel.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

babytravel.net

赤ちゃん 旅行 - ママらくちん♪子連れ旅行

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

232 ms

babytravel.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to babytravel.net homepage info - get ready to check Babytravel best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about babytravel.net

子連れ旅行。赤ちゃん 旅行。赤ちゃんや小さなお子さんを持つ家族が、安心して子連れ旅行を楽しめる宿情報がいっぱい！すべて赤ちゃん連れOKの宿ばかりです。ママがラクできるお得情報も。赤ちゃん 旅行なら「ママらくちん♪子連れ旅行」で宿を探そう！

Visit babytravel.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Babytravel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

babytravel.net performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,310 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

babytravel.net

1162 ms

styles.css

547 ms

javascript.js

376 ms

lightbox.js

563 ms

show_ads.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Babytravel.net, 11% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Babytravel.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

121.4 kB

After Optimization

81.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Babytravel.net main page is 121.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 50.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 28.6 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 217 B

  • Original 32.1 kB
  • After minification 31.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Babytravel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 50.4 kB
  • After minification 44.8 kB
  • After compression 39.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 8.6 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babytravel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (51%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babytravel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

babytravel.net

babytravel.net

1162 ms

styles.css

styles.css

547 ms

javascript.js

javascript.js

376 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

563 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

8 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

185 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

205 ms

head_logo.gif

head_logo.gif

562 ms

maincopy.jpg

maincopy.jpg

547 ms

face.gif

face.gif

205 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

38 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

179 ms

head_bg.jpg

head_bg.jpg

705 ms

ca-pub-9699427796967126.js

ca-pub-9699427796967126.js

82 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

77 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

77 ms

mds4.gif

mds4.gif

331 ms

arrow01.gif

arrow01.gif

344 ms

sidebar_arrow.gif

sidebar_arrow.gif

397 ms

mds3.gif

mds3.gif

511 ms

bg_news.gif

bg_news.gif

532 ms

allList.php

allList.php

828 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

sidebar_mds.gif

sidebar_mds.gif

638 ms

sidebar_bg.gif

sidebar_bg.gif

643 ms

sidebar_mds2.gif

sidebar_mds2.gif

658 ms

sidebar_bg2.gif

sidebar_bg2.gif

668 ms

ads

ads

215 ms

osd.js

osd.js

7 ms

138 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

132 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

278 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

29 ms

abg.js

abg.js

49 ms

favicon

favicon

50 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

37 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

22 ms

s

s

13 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

11 ms

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

3 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

559 ms

close.gif

close.gif

562 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

185 ms

ui

ui

34 ms

Accessibility Review

babytravel.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

babytravel.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

babytravel.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babytravel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Babytravel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

babytravel.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Babytravel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: