2.1 sec in total
52 ms
1.6 sec
443 ms
Welcome to back2back.org homepage info - get ready to check Back2 Back best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about back2back.org
Back2Back provides comprehensive care to vulnerable children and families across the world.
Visit back2back.orgWe analyzed Back2back.org page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
back2back.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
52 ms
145 ms
306 ms
35 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Back2back.org, 8% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (625 ms) relates to the external source Docs.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 824.4 kB (49%)
1.7 MB
843.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Back2back.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 906.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 809.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 809.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Back2 Back needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 918 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Back2back.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (73%)
105
28
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Back2 Back. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
back2back.org
52 ms
back2back.org
145 ms
sax8wfe.css
306 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
35 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
37 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
42 ms
dashicons.min.css
36 ms
uploader.style.build.css
39 ms
formreset.min.css
49 ms
formsmain.min.css
55 ms
readyclass.min.css
53 ms
browsers.min.css
52 ms
theme.min.css
59 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
62 ms
general.min.css
72 ms
eael-834.css
67 ms
eael-618.css
74 ms
eael-558.css
71 ms
eael-508.css
177 ms
eael-467.css
77 ms
style.min.css
80 ms
header-footer.min.css
88 ms
post-17.css
84 ms
eael-27.css
86 ms
swiper.min.css
91 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
94 ms
post-27.css
101 ms
post-637.css
99 ms
post-709.css
105 ms
post-834.css
108 ms
post-618.css
107 ms
post-558.css
122 ms
post-508.css
120 ms
post-467.css
120 ms
style_login_widget.min.css
126 ms
jquery.min.js
129 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
136 ms
api.js
38 ms
custom-pro-widget-nav-menu.min.css
117 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
119 ms
fontawesome-v4-shims.min.css
117 ms
widget-loop-builder.min.css
112 ms
jquery.json.min.js
118 ms
gravityforms.min.js
114 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
119 ms
utils.min.js
121 ms
page_conditional_logic.min.js
123 ms
filepondV1.build.js
135 ms
image-hopper.js
132 ms
script.min.js
123 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
116 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
121 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
127 ms
dom-ready.min.js
128 ms
hooks.min.js
122 ms
i18n.min.js
147 ms
a11y.min.js
129 ms
core.min.js
119 ms
datepicker.min.js
125 ms
datepicker-legacy.min.js
126 ms
datepicker.min.js
127 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
127 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
127 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
130 ms
jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js
132 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
123 ms
general.min.js
129 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
116 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
121 ms
menu.js
121 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
135 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
118 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
127 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
122 ms
frontend.min.js
126 ms
waypoints.min.js
295 ms
frontend.min.js
122 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
123 ms
p.css
18 ms
Back2Back-Logo-Horizontal.svg
43 ms
Get-Involved_Hover_blue.svg
41 ms
Logo_R.svg
44 ms
L-Imahe-1.webp
48 ms
Every-Story-Matters.webp
40 ms
Learn-More_Hover.svg
44 ms
Accordian_image_hp.webp
51 ms
Map_white.svg
104 ms
HOPE-DOESNT-STAND-STILL.svg
49 ms
Cancun_.webp
50 ms
Cincinnati_.webp
75 ms
Mazatlan_.webp
74 ms
Hyderabad.webp
76 ms
Jos-1.webp
75 ms
Linares.webp
75 ms
Monterrey_.webp
168 ms
Port-au-Prince.webp
168 ms
Santiago.webp
167 ms
Arrow_vector.svg
168 ms
ARROW_mobile.svg
168 ms
Footer-Logo.svg
216 ms
Child-Code-Image.png
218 ms
d
117 ms
d
152 ms
d
151 ms
d
152 ms
d
191 ms
d
166 ms
d
152 ms
d
166 ms
pub
625 ms
recaptcha__en.js
81 ms
datepicker.svg
39 ms
css
39 ms
AD_4nXd-OInPEM5rqWNQoigK4EcCVRr0kR7dQmSJdw1jii_pkj67e9xLgvB5KPTZH9LwM0ppD9u7ZHxnJvL6i5GwILVU-oHM5zsKEqziieLcx70m9-Qq9rVhjB9NgbhbxSFDg_Y0YVmA9BFIpojj_FBBDg
316 ms
font
18 ms
back2back.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
back2back.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
back2back.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Back2back.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Back2back.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
back2back.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Back2 Back. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: