1.8 sec in total
133 ms
1.6 sec
63 ms
Visit backgroundconnect.com now to see the best up-to-date Background Connect content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about backgroundconnect.com
BackgroundConnect - Pre-employment screening solutions
Visit backgroundconnect.comWe analyzed Backgroundconnect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
backgroundconnect.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value91.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value410 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
133 ms
240 ms
119 ms
170 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Backgroundconnect.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Backgroundconnect.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (3%)
42.0 MB
40.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Backgroundconnect.com main page is 42.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 41.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.8 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 573.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Background Connect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 162.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 162.3 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 381.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Backgroundconnect.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 381.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (74%)
58
15
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Background Connect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
backgroundconnect.com
133 ms
backgroundconnect.com
240 ms
bootstrap.min.css
119 ms
bootstrap-grid.min.css
170 ms
bootstrap-reboot.min.css
164 ms
animate.css
166 ms
owl.carousel.css
165 ms
owl.theme.css
163 ms
owl.transitions.css
175 ms
magnific-popup.css
221 ms
jquery.countdown.css
220 ms
style.css
292 ms
scheme-02.css
221 ms
coloring.css
222 ms
settings.css
232 ms
layers.css
285 ms
navigation.css
280 ms
backgroundconnect_logo1.png
327 ms
8.jpg
483 ms
15.jpg
387 ms
FCRA_Compliant_logo.png
388 ms
Houston_west_chamber_logo.png
339 ms
pbsa.svg
340 ms
criminal-search.jpeg
778 ms
drug-test.jpeg
761 ms
civil-search.jpeg
1015 ms
motor-vehicle.jpeg
936 ms
international-screen.jpeg
997 ms
reference-verification.jpeg
931 ms
jquery.min.js
838 ms
bootstrap.min.js
843 ms
wow.min.js
899 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
911 ms
easing.js
958 ms
owl.carousel.js
971 ms
validation.js
987 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
993 ms
enquire.min.js
1018 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
912 ms
jquery.plugin.js
890 ms
typed.js
897 ms
jarallax.js
895 ms
jquery.countTo.js
908 ms
jquery.countdown.js
909 ms
designesia.js
924 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
898 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
899 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
894 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
917 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
906 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
874 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
884 ms
css.css
875 ms
css2.css
846 ms
font-awesome.css
857 ms
icofont.min.css
858 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
879 ms
revolution.extension.migration.min.js
879 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
783 ms
businesswoman.png
506 ms
backgroundconnect.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
backgroundconnect.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
backgroundconnect.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
ZX
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Backgroundconnect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Backgroundconnect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
backgroundconnect.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Background Connect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: