Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

backupreview.info

Cloud Online File Data Backup Remote Offsite File Storage Reviews - Small Businesses, Enterprises, Providers Directory, SaaS, Cloud Computing, Data St...

Page Load Speed

17.6 sec in total

First Response

976 ms

Resources Loaded

7.2 sec

Page Rendered

9.5 sec

backupreview.info screenshot

About Website

Visit backupreview.info now to see the best up-to-date Backup Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about backupreview.info

Cloud Online Data File Remote Hybrid Internet Backup Recovery Services - #clouds #security #backup #storage #disasterrecovery reviews, CEO Interviews, monthly top 100 rankings, directory of service pr...

Visit backupreview.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Backupreview.info page load time and found that the first response time was 976 ms and then it took 16.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Backupreview.info rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

backupreview.info performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,180 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.201

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.backupreview.info

976 ms

style.css

132 ms

imghover.js

89 ms

dd-formmailer.css

94 ms

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Backupreview.info, 24% (24 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 890.6 kB (61%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

565.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Backupreview.info main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 573.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 424.1 kB

  • Original 521.6 kB
  • After minification 488.6 kB
  • After compression 97.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 424.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 199.1 kB
  • After minification 154.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Backup Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 308.8 kB

  • Original 573.2 kB
  • After minification 573.0 kB
  • After compression 264.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.8 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 112.7 kB

  • Original 161.7 kB
  • After minification 154.2 kB
  • After compression 49.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Backupreview.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 112.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (58%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Backup Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

backupreview.info accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

backupreview.info best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

backupreview.info SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Backupreview.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Backupreview.info main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Backup Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: