7.3 sec in total
388 ms
5.4 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Bags Tudio content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bagstudio.in
Bag Studio manufactures custom cotton and jute bags for promotions, packaging, and reselling. We help with concept to execution of bespoke bags.
Visit bagstudio.inWe analyzed Bagstudio.in page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
bagstudio.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value4,510 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.071
96/100
15%
Value25.2 s
0/100
10%
388 ms
786 ms
820 ms
202 ms
400 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Bagstudio.in, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Youtube-nocookie.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Bagstudio.in.
Page size can be reduced by 132.1 kB (4%)
3.0 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Bagstudio.in main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.6 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bags Tudio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bagstudio.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (34%)
94
62
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bags Tudio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bagstudio.in
388 ms
bagstudio.in
786 ms
www.bagstudio.in
820 ms
bootstrap.min.css
202 ms
font-awesome.min.css
400 ms
animate.min.css
597 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
602 ms
main.css
599 ms
jquery.js
602 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
601 ms
widget.css
94 ms
widget.js
205 ms
embed.php
216 ms
bootstrap.min.js
783 ms
mousescroll.js
789 ms
smoothscroll.js
796 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
795 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
805 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
803 ms
wow.min.js
1241 ms
main.js
1242 ms
js
59 ms
platform.js
29 ms
css
30 ms
7srwdz1jj0
43 ms
logo.png
609 ms
back1.jpg
839 ms
2019_certi.jpg
611 ms
back2.jpg
603 ms
back3.jpg
839 ms
back4.jpg
1182 ms
01.png
609 ms
03.png
1181 ms
04.png
992 ms
02.png
989 ms
06.png
1183 ms
01.jpg
1334 ms
02.jpg
1181 ms
03.jpg
1181 ms
04.jpg
1336 ms
05.jpg
1334 ms
06.jpg
1336 ms
07.jpg
1335 ms
08.jpg
1332 ms
09.jpg
1533 ms
10.jpg
1732 ms
11.jpg
1525 ms
12.jpg
1530 ms
13.jpg
1523 ms
31.jpg
1529 ms
14.jpg
1714 ms
15.jpg
1909 ms
16.jpg
1725 ms
lftracker_v1_DzLR5a5mPMzaBoQ2.js
580 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
33 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
44 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
54 ms
-eMOkfuunRo
169 ms
embed
564 ms
clarity.js
22 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1585 ms
17.jpg
1588 ms
18.jpg
1756 ms
19.jpg
1784 ms
20.jpg
1907 ms
21.jpg
1886 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
38 ms
base.js
68 ms
Create
214 ms
qoe
184 ms
Hg8RJ6IYDEt2XfeS9TTatHSj5NgA1bkUUg8jx44YVvw.js
70 ms
embed.js
31 ms
js
239 ms
22.jpg
1339 ms
23.jpg
1499 ms
24.jpg
1504 ms
25.jpg
1526 ms
26.jpg
1531 ms
27.jpg
1654 ms
diffuser.js
212 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
37 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
38 ms
-eMOkfuunRo
270 ms
js
268 ms
analytics.js
266 ms
28.jpg
1432 ms
29.jpg
1453 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
352 ms
30.jpg
1311 ms
wa.png
1341 ms
prism.app-us1.com
340 ms
collect
46 ms
bg.jpg
1159 ms
ethical1.jpg
1280 ms
back6.jpg
1288 ms
back5.jpg
1301 ms
Create
151 ms
back7.jpg
1504 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
215 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
217 ms
collect
224 ms
FAQ.jpg
1388 ms
bx_loader.gif
1205 ms
controls.png
1321 ms
GenerateIT
19 ms
c.gif
7 ms
bagstudio.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bagstudio.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bagstudio.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bagstudio.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bagstudio.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bagstudio.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bags Tudio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: