3.5 sec in total
124 ms
2.9 sec
419 ms
Click here to check amazing Bandwidth content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bandwidth.team
"Recruiting the right talent is key for business growth. Let our team at Bandwidth, a Seattle recruiting and staffing company, deliver the best candidate for you"
Visit bandwidth.teamWe analyzed Bandwidth.team page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
bandwidth.team performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value15.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value3,960 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
124 ms
1125 ms
76 ms
114 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Bandwidth.team, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bandwidth.team.
Page size can be reduced by 169.6 kB (10%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Bandwidth.team main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 143.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bandwidth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bandwidth.team has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (84%)
73
12
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bandwidth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bandwidth.team
124 ms
bandwidth.team
1125 ms
js
76 ms
gtm.js
114 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
74 ms
style.min.css
128 ms
block-style.css
195 ms
classic-themes.min.css
195 ms
animate-animo.css
199 ms
styles.css
195 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
Defaults.css
196 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
268 ms
pum-site-styles.css
231 ms
css
40 ms
main.min.css
245 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
234 ms
all.min.css
236 ms
back-compat.min.css
241 ms
fontello.min.css
290 ms
post-type.min.css
292 ms
custom.css
295 ms
media.css
341 ms
mega-menu.css
304 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
305 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
336 ms
style.css
337 ms
style.min.css
343 ms
jquery.min.js
353 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
353 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
388 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
403 ms
2266.css
409 ms
1932.css
410 ms
animate.min.css
426 ms
css
65 ms
background-style.min.css
426 ms
main.min.js
722 ms
animo.min.js
476 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
477 ms
viewportchecker.js
478 ms
edsanimate.js
479 ms
api.js
42 ms
edsanimate.site.js
478 ms
js
63 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
432 ms
js
49 ms
collect
26 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
384 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
333 ms
index.js
332 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
330 ms
akismet-frontend.js
358 ms
core.min.js
374 ms
css
58 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
343 ms
post-type.min.js
341 ms
wpcf7-recaptcha-controls.js
334 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
363 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
340 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
340 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
337 ms
custom.min.js
337 ms
skrollr.min.js
355 ms
1925.js
375 ms
logo-2.png
271 ms
pexels-cowomen-2041627-min-scaled.jpg
630 ms
footerback.jpg
255 ms
webnc-web.png
449 ms
Astra-web.png
383 ms
AvenirLTStd-Book.woff
337 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
40 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
49 ms
AvenirLTStd-Heavy.woff
327 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
64 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
73 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
71 ms
AvenirLTStd-Black.woff
334 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
571 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
336 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
571 ms
AvenirLTStd-Medium.woff
538 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
539 ms
sss-1.jpg
101 ms
quotes.png
101 ms
logo2.png
101 ms
pexels-thirdman-8485646.jpg
466 ms
bandwidth.team accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bandwidth.team best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bandwidth.team SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bandwidth.team can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bandwidth.team main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bandwidth.team
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bandwidth. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: