3.6 sec in total
151 ms
3.1 sec
368 ms
Visit bankingthefuture.com now to see the best up-to-date Bankingthefuture content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bankingthefuture.com
Fintech and web3 insights and analysis from the leading operators, analysts and investors in the world.
Visit bankingthefuture.comWe analyzed Bankingthefuture.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
bankingthefuture.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value6.5 s
38/100
10%
Value2,920 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
151 ms
86 ms
306 ms
38 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bankingthefuture.com, 66% (54 requests) were made to Rebank.cc and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Consentcdn.cookiebot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 142.7 kB (28%)
503.2 kB
360.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Bankingthefuture.com main page is 503.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 228.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bankingthefuture.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (91%)
67
6
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bankingthefuture. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bankingthefuture.com
151 ms
rebank.cc
86 ms
rebank.cc
306 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
38 ms
theme.css
42 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
132 ms
layerslider.css
173 ms
css
241 ms
style.min.css
103 ms
styles.css
173 ms
settings.css
203 ms
css
255 ms
css
307 ms
css
302 ms
font-awesome.min.css
245 ms
bootstrap.min.css
214 ms
font-awesome.min.css
197 ms
fonts.css
248 ms
owl.carousel.css
365 ms
owl.theme.css
235 ms
magnific-popup.css
355 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
359 ms
reset.css
250 ms
style.css
258 ms
js_composer.min.css
302 ms
greensock.js
350 ms
jquery.min.js
352 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
356 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
360 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
364 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
379 ms
wp-convertkit.js
395 ms
js
295 ms
uc.js
244 ms
index.js
360 ms
index.js
439 ms
index.js
459 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
360 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
377 ms
hooks.min.js
391 ms
i18n.min.js
391 ms
lodash.min.js
397 ms
url.min.js
388 ms
api-fetch.min.js
390 ms
index.js
395 ms
4550002.js
347 ms
load-more.js
393 ms
js
153 ms
gmaps.min.js
461 ms
api.js
279 ms
bootstrap.min.js
410 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
391 ms
retina.min.js
752 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
669 ms
wow.min.js
286 ms
admin-bar.js
303 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
271 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
240 ms
modernizr.js
255 ms
main.js
230 ms
index.js
558 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
228 ms
style.css
223 ms
rebank_logo_white-Converted.svg
181 ms
analytics.js
149 ms
cc.js
180 ms
bc-v4.min.html
1235 ms
OpenSans.woff
307 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
405 ms
OpenSans-Light.woff
364 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
363 ms
OpenSans-Semibold.woff
364 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
449 ms
OpenSans-Bold.woff
361 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
469 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
468 ms
collect
297 ms
ck.5.js
548 ms
collect
716 ms
gen_204
67 ms
recaptcha__en.js
173 ms
api.js
141 ms
bankingthefuture.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
bankingthefuture.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
bankingthefuture.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bankingthefuture.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bankingthefuture.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bankingthefuture.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bankingthefuture. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: