Tools & Wizards About Us
barker.college screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

barker.college

Barker College - Barker College

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

827 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

622 ms

barker.college screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Barker content for Australia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about barker.college

Visit barker.college

Key Findings

We analyzed Barker.college page load time and found that the first response time was 827 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

barker.college performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value21,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.28

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

barker.college

827 ms

styles.css

202 ms

site.js

992 ms

api.js

28 ms

gtm.js

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Barker.college, 4% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Barker.college.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 222.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Barker.college main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 84.9 kB

  • Original 95.6 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 44.6 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 86.6 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Barker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 179.0 kB
  • After minification 179.0 kB
  • After compression 134.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Barker.college needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (13%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Barker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

barker.college

barker.college

827 ms

styles.css

styles.css

202 ms

site.js

site.js

992 ms

api.js

api.js

28 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

98 ms

barker-logo-tagline-red.svg

barker-logo-tagline-red.svg

587 ms

barker-logo-red.svg

barker-logo-red.svg

792 ms

mark-web4.jpg

mark-web4.jpg

1199 ms

home-5-web2024.jpg

home-5-web2024.jpg

1614 ms

home-2-web2024.jpg

home-2-web2024.jpg

1624 ms

home-banner3-v2.jpg

home-banner3-v2.jpg

2048 ms

js-square.jpg

js-square.jpg

1001 ms

home-4-web.jpg

home-4-web.jpg

1392 ms

middle-school.jpg

middle-school.jpg

1229 ms

boarding.jpg

boarding.jpg

1607 ms

the-great-cause-digital-tile-ep3.jpg

the-great-cause-digital-tile-ep3.jpg

1886 ms

dance-showcase.png

dance-showcase.png

1830 ms

indigenous-carousel.jpg

indigenous-carousel.jpg

2016 ms

tour.jpg

tour.jpg

2224 ms

dscf4670.jpg

dscf4670.jpg

2040 ms

indigenous.jpg

indigenous.jpg

2047 ms

job-listing.jpg

job-listing.jpg

2106 ms

barker-logo-crest-white.svg

barker-logo-crest-white.svg

2211 ms

GT-Eesti-Text-Medium.woff

GT-Eesti-Text-Medium.woff

2151 ms

GT-Eesti-Text-Regular.woff

GT-Eesti-Text-Regular.woff

2169 ms

GT-Eesti-Text-Light.woff

GT-Eesti-Text-Light.woff

2156 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

Accessibility Review

barker.college accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

barker.college best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

barker.college SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Barker.college can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Barker.college main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

barker.college

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Barker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: