3.1 sec in total
135 ms
1.4 sec
1.6 sec
Welcome to basictravelcouple.com homepage info - get ready to check Basic Travel Couple best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about basictravelcouple.com
Traveling for Less with Credit Cards
Visit basictravelcouple.comWe analyzed Basictravelcouple.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
basictravelcouple.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value5,030 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
135 ms
190 ms
15 ms
36 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Basictravelcouple.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (469 ms) belongs to the original domain Basictravelcouple.com.
Page size can be reduced by 671.1 kB (24%)
2.7 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Basictravelcouple.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 664.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 664.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Basic Travel Couple images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (64%)
77
28
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Basic Travel Couple. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
basictravelcouple.com
135 ms
basictravelcouple.com
190 ms
jquery.min.js
15 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
36 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
35 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
156 ms
js.cookie.min.js
34 ms
woocommerce.min.js
154 ms
js
159 ms
qs_sesref.js
152 ms
js
327 ms
qdgt
338 ms
ta.js
147 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
148 ms
order-attribution.min.js
149 ms
script.min.js
290 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
295 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
290 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
294 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
294 ms
hooks.min.js
294 ms
vue.min.js
324 ms
jet-menu-public-scripts.js
324 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
331 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
394 ms
jet-plugins.js
323 ms
frontend.js
394 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
396 ms
frm.min.js
397 ms
api.js
287 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
427 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
392 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
429 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
429 ms
i18n.min.js
428 ms
frontend.min.js
428 ms
waypoints.min.js
425 ms
core.min.js
469 ms
frontend.min.js
454 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
468 ms
jet-blocks.min.js
453 ms
jet-elements.min.js
453 ms
widgets-scripts.js
458 ms
jet-tabs-frontend.min.js
443 ms
frontend.min.js
444 ms
fbevents.js
288 ms
core.js
288 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
338 ms
jet-blog.min.js
364 ms
lazyload.min.js
360 ms
fallback.jpg
370 ms
favicon.svg
360 ms
js
176 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
370 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
304 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
217 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
375 ms
d
130 ms
d
170 ms
recaptcha__en.js
103 ms
basic-travel_color.svg
70 ms
basic-travel_color-white.svg
71 ms
42028700-89ff-46be-b737-848fa1c76200.png
73 ms
Increased-Bonus-Offer-768x384.png
110 ms
AdobeStock_221228546-768x405.jpeg
125 ms
Blog-Post-Covers-5-768x384.png
466 ms
Southwest-CP-Cover-Photo-768x402.png
182 ms
Chase-sapphire-basic-overview1-768x384.png
73 ms
pexels-greta-hoffman-9705821-768x512.jpg
74 ms
save-768x512.jpg
74 ms
destinations-768x1152.jpg
75 ms
affordable-768x886.jpg
251 ms
credit-card-strategy-1024x683.jpg
106 ms
Snapseed-6-768x1024.jpg
106 ms
placeholder.png
107 ms
426829352_1601090360632648_8555759530844026505_nlow.jpg
133 ms
424599797_1504914146744338_3072923601989111631_nlow.jpg
67 ms
414462180_1347071365932920_8457230545552854210_nlow.jpg
78 ms
412654409_334775879412075_6796863198082699809_nlow.jpg
90 ms
412743009_878133007043764_7239811462398113110_nlow.jpg
100 ms
412437402_1090320285311103_4359934976431497309_nlow.jpg
110 ms
411111782_1447413705863973_983042839050592788_nlow.jpg
121 ms
408739809_176259892233727_4167485115253599252_nlow.jpg
211 ms
412654409_334775879412075_6796863198082699809_nfull.jpg
41 ms
411111782_1447413705863973_983042839050592788_nfull.jpg
22 ms
basictravelcouple.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
basictravelcouple.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
basictravelcouple.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Basictravelcouple.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Basictravelcouple.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
basictravelcouple.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Basic Travel Couple. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: