3.5 sec in total
212 ms
2.6 sec
721 ms
Visit batharms.com now to see the best up-to-date Bath Arms content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about batharms.com
Hotel in Cheddar. Book direct for best prices guaranteed online. For great accommodation in Somerset choose Bath Arms Hotel
Visit batharms.comWe analyzed Batharms.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
batharms.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
28/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value7.2 s
29/100
10%
Value1,140 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.883
3/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
212 ms
455 ms
53 ms
179 ms
266 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Batharms.com, 15% (10 requests) were made to Secure.hotels.uk.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (719 ms) belongs to the original domain Batharms.com.
Page size can be reduced by 149.6 kB (9%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Batharms.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bath Arms images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Batharms.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (42%)
60
35
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bath Arms. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
batharms.com
212 ms
batharms.com
455 ms
font-awesome.min.css
53 ms
e6da7ddb6b3d6a5ceb61a5d6ced75acd.css
179 ms
8d58e8417f6f34ec575e468428f28e36.css
266 ms
ec62c3f826ff54509b4f572097c6f212.css
267 ms
c988665ebd7f399a38765c2b63b6b509.css
267 ms
80a273ef823bbbe781493b6053f0deea.css
266 ms
jquery.min.js
22 ms
css2
28 ms
275629c736a83e4c05fc037b546d131f.js
266 ms
bd74ad5400f85238b33e31de541ccedc.js
268 ms
84f5c8ba4105af3380815eacd07c25d0.js
350 ms
a45b8f209be614921a9d013faf6e8eba.js
528 ms
72071bbf823578e623c89b8417b994fa.js
354 ms
faf198ee1c9976549dd13952ee3bf19e.js
352 ms
widgets.js
346 ms
189f635e3715c6ff937b42694eab7942.css
180 ms
css
14 ms
css
13 ms
ionicons.min.css
264 ms
e2a43670539ca0dc876864b233b7992b.jpg
94 ms
9ff0db667ebe28e22cbc481faed0941e.jpg
290 ms
bc8e8fa82b6761f42ef49ec6326f1097.jpg
527 ms
0c96a6c85b81f2eba13032ecd35a5004.jpg
398 ms
04e27699e9688c8cc6c5068b294ab816.jpg
288 ms
c7ac9ebbf1f01aeab4fbd3dd557099d4.jpg
370 ms
f1b537038593b007170b30ec7073a133.jpg
365 ms
e95d6a0e61292d583c6c53c563b2c5aa.jpg
645 ms
20d7919d9348a6995936e1a2d8635f6a.jpg
464 ms
e2e7b3d43da5fbe00cf957d7713b494a.png
542 ms
292d7238d7bb1cb46e7602570c67432b.jpg
461 ms
8006171f157c2dbaf5b00c4aedbdbe7b.jpg
486 ms
8f1ef9ac242201b156a74e3f71d387ef.jpg
548 ms
648812bb48a3a94ac70b8253aa3b022f.jpg
553 ms
621d5063d811a2306c832b8b4e47c767.jpg
575 ms
ddc219e3a33bfa3f490ce4a9afdb62ec.jpg
615 ms
11f7d32b7198b778f37db87c9016121a.jpg
631 ms
0210c154d75b70d25532d72493e0657f.jpg
642 ms
9a8e6fe5a02b49b315c03e4e795430e5.jpg
642 ms
3c26acef1fb9f4220b6f3e84d70f9c0d.jpg
664 ms
fa1c470838be2bb5720c5a139e649234.jpg
706 ms
57d964f96c07b4cfffe3ec9df522c7e3.jpg
719 ms
css
15 ms
loading-2.gif
660 ms
font
137 ms
font
137 ms
font
137 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
122 ms
ed295611b95d9472723def4a985b46ae.png
604 ms
6ae83ed3424de54c74d90f55035cfccb.png
605 ms
664e526e4d50e0371f777bf10786ef26.png
625 ms
6bc8530b415524bb4f333389403ce35c.png
664 ms
widgets.js
146 ms
sdk.js
82 ms
review-aggregate-iframe-custom.php
402 ms
61c9a19f20b30833514e898cdf031d02.woff
529 ms
1
387 ms
sdk.js
24 ms
jquery.min.js
314 ms
jquery.raty.min.js
233 ms
widget1.js
447 ms
widget1.css
308 ms
icon-down-arrow-grey.svg
305 ms
star-on.png
108 ms
star-off.png
261 ms
font
5 ms
batharms.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
batharms.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
batharms.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Batharms.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Batharms.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
batharms.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bath Arms. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: