Tools & Wizards About Us
baytaper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

baytaper.com

The BayTaper Project – Scenes from the San Francisco Jazz & Creative Music Scene (2005-2012)

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

427 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

668 ms

baytaper.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bay Taper content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about baytaper.com

Visit baytaper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Baytaper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

baytaper.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.baytaper.com

427 ms

style.min.css

136 ms

1ec34371acef3c6b4f0ce6475c533c95.css

132 ms

style.css

193 ms

blocks.css

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Baytaper.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Baytaper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.1 kB (1%)

Content Size

10.5 MB

After Optimization

10.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Baytaper.com main page is 10.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 98.3 kB

  • Original 129.1 kB
  • After minification 123.3 kB
  • After compression 30.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 10.3 MB
  • After minification 10.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bay Taper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 59 B

  • Original 54.9 kB
  • After minification 54.9 kB
  • After compression 54.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 46.8 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Baytaper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (33%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bay Taper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.baytaper.com

www.baytaper.com

427 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

136 ms

1ec34371acef3c6b4f0ce6475c533c95.css

1ec34371acef3c6b4f0ce6475c533c95.css

132 ms

style.css

style.css

193 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

130 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

133 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

133 ms

aos.min.css

aos.min.css

199 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

266 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

202 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

200 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

201 ms

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

340 ms

aos.min.js

aos.min.js

341 ms

functions.min.js

functions.min.js

341 ms

Homepage_3x2_2010.06.29.MSJO_.FantasyStudios.RecordingSession.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2856.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2010.06.29.MSJO_.FantasyStudios.RecordingSession.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2856.jpg

1429 ms

Homepage_3x2_2010.09.03.SFSymphony.Pics_.Orig-IMG_6465.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2010.09.03.SFSymphony.Pics_.Orig-IMG_6465.jpg

1182 ms

Homepage_3x2_2008.04.04.JoeBagale.OtisMcDonald.GAMH_.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0697.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2008.04.04.JoeBagale.OtisMcDonald.GAMH_.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0697.jpg

1571 ms

Homepage-2012.03.27.RealisticOrchestra.TreatStreetSocialClub.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0090.jpg

Homepage-2012.03.27.RealisticOrchestra.TreatStreetSocialClub.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0090.jpg

1612 ms

Homepage_3x2_2007.11.12.SFCM_.Jazz_.Concert.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2758.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2007.11.12.SFCM_.Jazz_.Concert.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2758.jpg

782 ms

Homepage_3x2_2009.02.21.MarcusShelby.MLK_.RedPoppy.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2617-Enhanced-NR.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2009.02.21.MarcusShelby.MLK_.RedPoppy.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2617-Enhanced-NR.jpg

852 ms

Homepage_3x2_2008.12.01.BayAreaAllStars.YoshisSF.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0586.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2008.12.01.BayAreaAllStars.YoshisSF.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0586.jpg

915 ms

Homepage_3x2_2008.05.15.FarCry.DeYoung.Pics_.Orig-IMG_1481.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2008.05.15.FarCry.DeYoung.Pics_.Orig-IMG_1481.jpg

1117 ms

Homepage_3x2_2006.09.12.ShotgunWedding.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2779-Enhanced-NR-2.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2006.09.12.ShotgunWedding.Pics_.Orig-IMG_2779-Enhanced-NR-2.jpg

1175 ms

Homepage_3x2_2009.08.21.BrassBowsBeats.YoshisSF.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0008.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2009.08.21.BrassBowsBeats.YoshisSF.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0008.jpg

1488 ms

Homepage_3x2_2007.09.15.TreasureIslandFest.ThieveryCorporation.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0204.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2007.09.15.TreasureIslandFest.ThieveryCorporation.Pics_.Orig-IMG_0204.jpg

1994 ms

Homepage_3x2_2007.06.29.TerrenceBrewerRecordingSession.Pics_.Orig-IMG_4347.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2007.06.29.TerrenceBrewerRecordingSession.Pics_.Orig-IMG_4347.jpg

2369 ms

Homepage_3x2_2006.12.19.BrassMafia.Pics_.Orig-IMG_5523-Enhanced-NR.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2006.12.19.BrassMafia.Pics_.Orig-IMG_5523-Enhanced-NR.jpg

1747 ms

Homepage_3x2_2009.04.18.JazzMafiaSymphony.Pics_.Orig-IMG_6475.jpg

Homepage_3x2_2009.04.18.JazzMafiaSymphony.Pics_.Orig-IMG_6475.jpg

1997 ms

Homepage_Slideshow_PlayButton.jpg

Homepage_Slideshow_PlayButton.jpg

2138 ms

BAYTAPER_900px_20151212_5D3_0614.jpg

BAYTAPER_900px_20151212_5D3_0614.jpg

2068 ms

BAYTAPER_900px_20141205_5D3_9476.jpg

BAYTAPER_900px_20141205_5D3_9476.jpg

2011 ms

BAYTAPER_900px_20121214_5D3_6643.jpg

BAYTAPER_900px_20121214_5D3_6643.jpg

2444 ms

BAYTAPER_900px_20121117_5D3_6413.jpg

BAYTAPER_900px_20121117_5D3_6413.jpg

2519 ms

BAYTAPER_900px_20121114_5D3_5576.jpg

BAYTAPER_900px_20121114_5D3_5576.jpg

2334 ms

BAYTAPER_900px_20121017_5D3_4953.jpg

BAYTAPER_900px_20121017_5D3_4953.jpg

2596 ms

BAYTAPER_900px_20120526_5D3_2252.jpg

BAYTAPER_900px_20120526_5D3_2252.jpg

2648 ms

Accessibility Review

baytaper.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

baytaper.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

baytaper.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Baytaper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Baytaper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

baytaper.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bay Taper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: