Tools & Wizards About Us
beam.ng screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

beam.ng

beam.ng - Insurance Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

997 ms in total

First Response

346 ms

Resources Loaded

586 ms

Page Rendered

65 ms

beam.ng screenshot

About Website

Welcome to beam.ng homepage info - get ready to check Beam best content right away, or after learning these important things about beam.ng

beam.ng is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, beam.ng has it all. We hope you find what you ar...

Visit beam.ng

Key Findings

We analyzed Beam.ng page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 651 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beam.ng performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beam.ng

346 ms

ww25.beam.ng

237 ms

bUmPonZYS.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beam.ng, 67% (2 requests) were made to Ww25.beam.ng. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) belongs to the original domain Beam.ng.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.1 kB (40%)

Content Size

34.9 kB

After Optimization

20.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beam.ng main page is 34.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 24.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 340 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 819 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 340 B or 29% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 24.4 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beam needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 833 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 619 B
  • After compression 408 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 833 B or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beam.ng needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beam. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

beam.ng

beam.ng

346 ms

ww25.beam.ng

ww25.beam.ng

237 ms

bUmPonZYS.js

bUmPonZYS.js

3 ms

Accessibility Review

beam.ng accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

beam.ng best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

beam.ng SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beam.ng can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beam.ng main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beam.ng

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: