Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

beautifulsavage.com

** Chad Saville - Magazine Editor and Digital Producer, Web content producer **

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

19 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

83 ms

beautifulsavage.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to beautifulsavage.com homepage info - get ready to check Beautifulsavage best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about beautifulsavage.com

Chad Saville is editor-in-chief of Beautiful Savage Magazine--digital producer in photography, web, content strategy, print, and video.

Visit beautifulsavage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautifulsavage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 19 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautifulsavage.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

beautifulsavage.com

19 ms

chadsaville.com

19 ms

chadsaville.squarespace.com

87 ms

XxJ8Ptg3cTrsvlhOPxnqUjnMLXmgZqKYi-kW7atPXRqfeT6ffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9DwRJhjD8KZQsKwe4KZA9tFDSDwQBRFUTRHKoR-eBqShBh-AUCZPoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCjhyyZYFyic8Cde90SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUaiaS0jhyyZYFyic8Cde90SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicIKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifG4fHCgIMMjMPMfH6qJtKGbMg62JMJ7fbKzMsMMeMb6MKG4fJCgIMMjgkMfH6qJtkGbMg6FJMJ7fbK3MsMMeMt6MKG4fJ3gIMMjIPMfH6qJyB9bMs6IJMJ7fbKgmsMgeMS6MKG4fJFmIMIj2PMfqMeauTL1gb.js

85 ms

legacy.js

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beautifulsavage.com, 37% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 37% (11 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (267 ms) relates to the external source Chadsaville.squarespace.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 760 B (3%)

Content Size

27.5 kB

After Optimization

26.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Beautifulsavage.com main page is 27.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 26.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 253 B

  • Original 619 B
  • After minification 619 B
  • After compression 366 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 253 B or 41% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 507 B

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 26.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (61%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautifulsavage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

beautifulsavage.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

beautifulsavage.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

beautifulsavage.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautifulsavage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Beautifulsavage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautifulsavage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: