13.3 sec in total
3.5 sec
9 sec
783 ms
Visit beauty-defect-repair.com now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Defectrepair content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beauty-defect-repair.com
With results extremely close to medicine, bdr® offers a effective alternative to invasive treatments to a certain extent. Trust in bdr®.
Visit beauty-defect-repair.comWe analyzed Beauty-defect-repair.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
beauty-defect-repair.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.5 s
0/100
10%
Value17.6 s
0/100
25%
Value23.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,390 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.279
43/100
15%
Value32.1 s
0/100
10%
3549 ms
36 ms
445 ms
315 ms
315 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Beauty-defect-repair.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) relates to the external source Bdr-beauty.de.
Page size can be reduced by 3.1 MB (82%)
3.7 MB
663.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Beauty-defect-repair.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beauty-defect-repair.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (44%)
50
28
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Defectrepair. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
3549 ms
uc.js
36 ms
style.min.css
445 ms
init.css
315 ms
styles.css
315 ms
duplicate-page-and-post-admin.min.css
332 ms
uncode-privacy-public.css
440 ms
styles.min.css
339 ms
style.min.css
426 ms
style.css
1149 ms
uncode-icons.css
764 ms
style-custom.css
1005 ms
jquery.min.js
820 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
823 ms
timeme.min.js
802 ms
burst.min.js
884 ms
init.js
1091 ms
underscore.min.js
864 ms
daves-wordpress-live-search.js
884 ms
index.js
936 ms
index.js
989 ms
js-cookie.min.js
1002 ms
uncode-privacy-public.min.js
1042 ms
plugins.js
1636 ms
app.js
1566 ms
bdr_Beatuy_logo.svg
141 ms
skin_care_ritual_rejuvenation_aktionen_bdr.png.webp
340 ms
skin_care_ritual_balance_aktionen_bdr.png.webp
198 ms
114850-16-box-RG-set-Sun-Care-.jpg.webp
125 ms
114850-15-box-RG-set-Brightening-.jpg.webp
247 ms
skin_care_ritual_purification_aktionen_bdr.png.webp
304 ms
skin_care_ritual_v-lift_aktionen_bdr.png.webp
339 ms
skin_care_ritual_glow_aktionen_bdr.png.webp
380 ms
skin_care_ritual_hydration_aktionen_bdr.png.webp
458 ms
114855-8-BrighteningTrinity-mockup-small.png.webp
462 ms
119950619_1202420063484445_2691370275434143011_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
450 ms
91516301_200975461195189_9118792226803597353_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
495 ms
100877156_2985323148231004_2506635003632994586_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
631 ms
120818291_4921175041286121_8612753157470230631_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
632 ms
64987579_2613425508685950_7507681737079528079_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
632 ms
65860116_2380189472304343_3623879568875738874_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
632 ms
65301652_2343230912430289_5391999726762379547_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
632 ms
65801544_2474760345952862_9176212793219749631_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
634 ms
102978881_199447508179160_8438318842992323588_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
679 ms
103536676_610083389866701_4152567090732897743_n.jpg.webp
750 ms
103715490_166104781588240_3358217654301106893_n-uai-1080x810.jpg.webp
717 ms
105405505_657092148209386_1718669757851525546_n-uai-720x540.jpg.webp
722 ms
step-one_Zeichenfl%C3%A4che-1_Zeichenfl%C3%A4che-1.svg
3557 ms
step-two_Zeichenfl%C3%A4che-1.svg
3560 ms
step-four_Zeichenfl%C3%A4che-1.svg
3570 ms
step-five_Zeichenfl%C3%A4che-1.svg
3323 ms
heart-1.svg
849 ms
Poppins-Regular.ttf
1111 ms
Poppins-Medium.ttf
2053 ms
Poppins-Light.ttf
1475 ms
Poppins-ExtraLight.ttf
1525 ms
Poppins-Thin.ttf
1716 ms
Poppins-SemiBold.ttf
1904 ms
Poppins-Bold.ttf
2085 ms
uncode-icons.woff
2285 ms
Banner-bdr-webseite-scaled.jpg.webp
2141 ms
114850-16-box-RG-set-Sun-Care-.jpg.webp
2214 ms
slider_9-rosa.jpg.webp
2329 ms
beauty-defect-repair.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
beauty-defect-repair.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
beauty-defect-repair.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beauty-defect-repair.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beauty-defect-repair.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beauty-defect-repair.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beauty Defectrepair. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: