Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

beautybar.com

BeautyBar.com @ Amazon.com

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

25 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

279 ms

beautybar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Beauty Bar content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautybar.com

Online shopping for BeautyBar.com at Amazon.com

Visit beautybar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautybar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautybar.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

beautybar.com

25 ms

www.beautybar.com

185 ms

authorize

142 ms

resource

38 ms

www.beautybar.com

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 131 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Beautybar.com, 22% (29 requests) were made to Images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com and 18% (23 requests) were made to Beautybar.q-assets.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) relates to the external source C3.q-assets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 989.1 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

903.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Beautybar.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 889.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 127.0 kB

  • Original 154.5 kB
  • After minification 126.0 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 67.4 kB

  • Original 573.5 kB
  • After minification 506.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beauty Bar needs image optimization as it can save up to 67.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 568.5 kB

  • Original 889.3 kB
  • After minification 887.8 kB
  • After compression 320.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 568.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 226.3 kB

  • Original 275.8 kB
  • After minification 275.3 kB
  • After compression 49.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautybar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (48%)

Requests Now

116

After Optimization

60

The browser has sent 116 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Bar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

beautybar.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautybar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Beautybar.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beauty Bar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: