Analyze

beautybeat.co: BEAUTY BEAT

pr brand building and marketing online and mobile learning masterclasses for start-ups, small businesses and beauty brands. How to do your own PR

Page load speed analysis

  • 64/100

    Normal result
  • 6

    Successful tests
  • 2

    Failed tests
  • First response

    108 ms

  • Resources loaded

    1.7 sec

  • Page rendered

    1 sec

  • Total page load time

    2.8 sec

Click here to check amazing BEAUTY BEAT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautybeat.co

We analyzed Beautybeat.co page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Page optimization

  • HTML 233.9 kB
    Images 17.6 kB
    Javascripts 10.2 kB
    CSS 58.9 kB

    In fact, the total size of Beautybeat.co main page is 320.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 233.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

    • Original 233.9 kB
    • After minification 230.4 kB
    • After compression 51.8 kB

    HTML optimization

    HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 182.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

    • Original 17.6 kB
    • After optimization 15.4 kB

    Image optimization

    Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, BEAUTY BEAT needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

    • Original 10.2 kB
    • After minification 10.2 kB
    • After compression 4.2 kB

    JavaScript optimization

    It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

    • Original 58.9 kB
    • After minification 58.9 kB
    • After compression 12.7 kB

    CSS optimization

    CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautybeat.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Network requests diagram

  • beautybeat.co
  • beautybeat.co
  • all.min.css
  • css
  • center.js
  • cnQRWqR-wvnGSvqhhA9MMstt40x6P07cZtDMKkbRLXdHzi7gj2lnH56LCbVKvaDWC4s1qxzXF6YInugvVx8oqg=w16
  • QNMuq_Zm7t1cMbu0MfHJVkv7Twk232K82bzNADWOcH9B-xJFmTnt-WbNRN77aGWBlLFpm7-bE-OAeuoARM0a=w16
  • Jazl_UIBw_ro2PojFMEjm2BMtkticBAV1pLWqenwZbLvheUB-_WSxxGaKW4VlNIkajwLxTYcuwVI-cv56lGgfQ=w16
  • UC3XgSjevmCdW0N4McP--WnU_Qx1haZxvkQhwx_Zclyg6P67jTGJOegcI6LNmfqKq9H2DO1mXzoTipjLmw4dJA=s0
  • diKMMDlLduIeEXLB3iacj7MkfrD61EyRTLLTW7eV_riChoqRKkm1BDzc5N18IFoHPDP_bCYeFdPip6V8vkXM9A=s0
  • 8bJkyzW8JW5vl7TbHmOaQgnX0C-O6br1sh3hI83Q_g6BI2zGqmeQpSGjTCNF5zT5Zgy1gYi_Zs3RVA7gQkxkAA=w16
  • c1iUKzf_InYgV0WercncSiYNQh4a59nxqVjiepSBE2ZDTs94qD8elkdTxRvWvRQK86TcamRLNn-MgLkv0B5K=s0
  • NTLr2-wE96Qgx9YnyyBFhRbsKz57bBeb3cVVpRgp-bbK1oIQRQaIVMKrX1o0s-6RIZv1aSdxhjkjLnSiWNB7Cw=s0
  • zpdeL4miiy4E1HXlD88MHQUdAcZJjQDjR0GYMEegw2uFf5dHuKR6L4Y0nPQ-EkdaE1oWeqOFyG0CbXKKgBMKRTo=w16
  • nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
  • nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDXbtY.ttf
  • nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf
  • KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
  • KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
  • KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
  • KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
  • TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
  • TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYA.ttf
  • TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
  • TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
  • fa-solid-900.woff
  • fa-regular-400.woff
  • identify.html
  • cnQRWqR-wvnGSvqhhA9MMstt40x6P07cZtDMKkbRLXdHzi7gj2lnH56LCbVKvaDWC4s1qxzXF6YInugvVx8oqg=w1680
  • capture
  • QNMuq_Zm7t1cMbu0MfHJVkv7Twk232K82bzNADWOcH9B-xJFmTnt-WbNRN77aGWBlLFpm7-bE-OAeuoARM0a=w341
  • Jazl_UIBw_ro2PojFMEjm2BMtkticBAV1pLWqenwZbLvheUB-_WSxxGaKW4VlNIkajwLxTYcuwVI-cv56lGgfQ=w341

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Beautybeat.co, 38% (12 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 34% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) relates to the external source Lh3.googleusercontent.com.

Additional info on beautybeat.co

Requests

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BEAUTY BEAT. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

1

Javascripts

13

Images

2

CSS

1

AJAX

17

All

Possible request optimization

1

Javascripts

13

Images

2

CSS

1

AJAX

0

Optimized

17

All

Normal result

Redirects

As for redirects, our browser was forwarded to https://beautybeat.co/ before it reached this domain.

IP address

Beautybeat.co uses IP address which is currently shared with 4 other domains. The more sites share the same IP address, the higher the host server’s workload is. It is strongly recommended that the host server should be changed or the hosting provider should be requested to give a different (separate) IP address for this domain.

Poor result

IP Trace

beautybeat.co

bike.com

4dasoul.com

bluepeople.com

darrenmonroe.com

35.202.21.90

DNS records

Type Host Target/ip TTL Other
A

beautybeat.co

35.202.21.90 300
NS

beautybeat.co

ns67.domaincontrol.com 300
NS

beautybeat.co

ns68.domaincontrol.com 300
SOA

beautybeat.co

300 Mname: ns67.domaincontrol.com
Rname: dns.jomax.net
Serial: 2019050101
Refresh: 28800
Retry: 7200
Expire: 604800
Minimum-ttl: 600
MX

beautybeat.co

beautybeat-co.mail.protection.outlook.com 300 Pri: 0

Language and encoding

Good result

Language

EN en language flag

Detected

EN en language flag

Claimed

Encoding

UTF-8

Claimed

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautybeat.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautybeat.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

HTTPS certificate

SSL Certificate

Beautybeat.co has no SSL certificate. Web browsing can be safer with HTTPS connection, so we suggest that it should be obtained for this site.

Poor result

Visitor World Map

The server of Beautybeat.co is located in United States, but, unfortunately, we cannot identify the countries where the visitors come from and thus it’s impossible to define if the distance can potentially affect the page load time.

Good result

Normal result

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BEAUTY BEAT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

beautybeat.co

Share this report in social media

Analyze another website

Analyze