Tools & Wizards About Us
beautybulletin.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

beautybulletin.com

Apply to exclusive influencer projects with Beauty Bulletin | Beauty Bulletin

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

beautybulletin.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Beauty Bulletin content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautybulletin.com

Beauty Bulletin is a South African influencer network for beauty brands, including makeup, hair, skincare, personal care, health, wellness & more

Visit beautybulletin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautybulletin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautybulletin.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,680 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.111

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beautybulletin.com

248 ms

beautybulletin.com

295 ms

www.beautybulletin.com

3948 ms

autoptimize_f4c6a6ff25c2c6aa4aea7bcdd42f6afb.css

98 ms

js

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Beautybulletin.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Beautybulletin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 514.5 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautybulletin.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 878.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 514.3 kB

  • Original 565.2 kB
  • After minification 564.4 kB
  • After compression 51.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 514.3 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 878.0 kB
  • After minification 878.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty Bulletin images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 149 B

  • Original 621.8 kB
  • After minification 621.8 kB
  • After compression 621.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 285.9 kB
  • After minification 285.9 kB
  • After compression 285.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautybulletin.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (57%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Bulletin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beautybulletin.com

beautybulletin.com

248 ms

beautybulletin.com

beautybulletin.com

295 ms

www.beautybulletin.com

www.beautybulletin.com

3948 ms

autoptimize_f4c6a6ff25c2c6aa4aea7bcdd42f6afb.css

autoptimize_f4c6a6ff25c2c6aa4aea7bcdd42f6afb.css

98 ms

js

js

62 ms

autoptimize_single_2c1432bdeef2882370bffc3b54488df7.css

autoptimize_single_2c1432bdeef2882370bffc3b54488df7.css

29 ms

autoptimize_single_38b6b642d56f67bd864e2c3bb08c0426.css

autoptimize_single_38b6b642d56f67bd864e2c3bb08c0426.css

38 ms

autoptimize_single_9af4511d1a872c412f37f5d9c2ea7d2d.css

autoptimize_single_9af4511d1a872c412f37f5d9c2ea7d2d.css

34 ms

autoptimize_single_3ac204a79d50d6edda65bf8a02a08ddf.css

autoptimize_single_3ac204a79d50d6edda65bf8a02a08ddf.css

33 ms

autoptimize_single_cf7d4392d34c86acecc1dd5a98e233d6.css

autoptimize_single_cf7d4392d34c86acecc1dd5a98e233d6.css

49 ms

autoptimize_single_eb9e060a616ea11c5059c8062a80efe1.css

autoptimize_single_eb9e060a616ea11c5059c8062a80efe1.css

51 ms

pvc.min.css

pvc.min.css

47 ms

css

css

36 ms

autoptimize_single_048a59605ea7628d43211fe48955050e.css

autoptimize_single_048a59605ea7628d43211fe48955050e.css

57 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

93 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

237 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

92 ms

form.css

form.css

355 ms

validation.js

validation.js

188 ms

autoptimize_6937555cc84af694d290c71719e5daea.js

autoptimize_6937555cc84af694d290c71719e5daea.js

702 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

137 ms

css

css

137 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

138 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

138 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

158 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

158 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

158 ms

6622panton-regular.woff

6622panton-regular.woff

512 ms

7709panton-bold.woff

7709panton-bold.woff

508 ms

jrIcons.woff

jrIcons.woff

507 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

13 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

21 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

41 ms

header-banner-2-mobile.jpg

header-banner-2-mobile.jpg

43 ms

header-banner-1-mobile.jpg

header-banner-1-mobile.jpg

51 ms

header-banner-3-mobile.jpg

header-banner-3-mobile.jpg

48 ms

header-banner-4-mobile.jpg

header-banner-4-mobile.jpg

35 ms

header-banner-5-mobile.jpg

header-banner-5-mobile.jpg

61 ms

7295panton-light.woff

7295panton-light.woff

280 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

535 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

450 ms

twitter_x.woff

twitter_x.woff

448 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

50 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

50 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

154 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

192 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

194 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

194 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

196 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

195 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

195 ms

BB-Logo-1.svg

BB-Logo-1.svg

389 ms

main.js

main.js

169 ms

header-banner-1.jpg

header-banner-1.jpg

89 ms

header-banner-2.jpg

header-banner-2.jpg

514 ms

header-banner-3.jpg

header-banner-3.jpg

87 ms

header-banner-4.jpg

header-banner-4.jpg

88 ms

header-banner-5.jpg

header-banner-5.jpg

48 ms

Accessibility Review

beautybulletin.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

beautybulletin.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

beautybulletin.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautybulletin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautybulletin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautybulletin.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beauty Bulletin. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: