Access beautybybuford.com. BEAUTY by BUFORD | Gregory A. Buford, MD, FACS, PCEO

Report Summary

About Website

Click here to check amazing BEAUTY By BUFORD content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautybybuford.com

Denver and Lone Tree plastic surgeon Gregory A. Buford, MD, FACS, PCEO uses innovative cosmetic approaches to enhance your beauty and boost your confidence.

Visit beautybybuford.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

www.beautybybuford.com

502 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

430 ms

styles.css

581 ms

normalize.css

438 ms

all.css

383 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Beautybybuford.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Secure.ifbyphone.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Beautybybuford.com.

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

718.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Beautybybuford.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 683.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 79.8 kB

Original 92.3 kB
After minification 89.6 kB
After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 82.5 kB

Original 683.1 kB
After minification 600.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, BEAUTY By BUFORD needs image optimization as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 173.7 kB

Original 259.3 kB
After minification 248.3 kB
After compression 85.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 115.8 kB

Original 135.6 kB
After minification 98.9 kB
After compression 19.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautybybuford.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BEAUTY By BUFORD. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautybybuford.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautybybuford.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautybybuford.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BEAUTY By BUFORD. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

BEAUTY by BUFORD | Gregory A. Buford, MD, FACS, PCEO

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)