Tools & Wizards About Us
beautydna.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

beautydna.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

38 ms

Resources Loaded

701 ms

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

beautydna.com screenshot

About Website

Visit beautydna.com now to see the best up-to-date Beautydna content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautydna.com

Visit beautydna.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautydna.com page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautydna.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

beautydna.com

38 ms

styles.css

48 ms

loggedout.js

126 ms

gtm.js

186 ms

logo.png

192 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Beautydna.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (476 ms) belongs to the original domain Beautydna.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 966.0 kB (38%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautydna.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 17.6 kB
  • After minification 15.6 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 400.8 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beautydna needs image optimization as it can save up to 400.8 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 462.1 kB

  • Original 657.4 kB
  • After minification 657.3 kB
  • After compression 195.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 462.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 103.2 kB
  • After minification 103.1 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautydna.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (11%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

40

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautydna. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beautydna.com

beautydna.com

38 ms

styles.css

styles.css

48 ms

loggedout.js

loggedout.js

126 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

186 ms

logo.png

logo.png

192 ms

beauty-shelves-desktop.png

beauty-shelves-desktop.png

476 ms

matched-down.png

matched-down.png

190 ms

profile-product-desktop.png

profile-product-desktop.png

196 ms

profile-bg.png

profile-bg.png

193 ms

match-product-desktop.png

match-product-desktop.png

407 ms

match-bg.png

match-bg.png

194 ms

experience-product-desktop.png

experience-product-desktop.png

200 ms

experience-bg.png

experience-bg.png

397 ms

join-now-bg.png

join-now-bg.png

396 ms

miracle-skin.png

miracle-skin.png

189 ms

skin-ceuticals.png

skin-ceuticals.png

190 ms

phillip-b.png

phillip-b.png

190 ms

natura-bisse.png

natura-bisse.png

191 ms

moroccanoil.png

moroccanoil.png

192 ms

my-body.png

my-body.png

193 ms

kora-organics.png

kora-organics.png

193 ms

avene.png

avene.png

193 ms

dermalogica.png

dermalogica.png

195 ms

klorane.png

klorane.png

195 ms

algenist.png

algenist.png

195 ms

drunk-elephant.png

drunk-elephant.png

196 ms

l-occitane.png

l-occitane.png

196 ms

dr-brandt.png

dr-brandt.png

191 ms

babor.png

babor.png

191 ms

37.png

37.png

192 ms

3-LAB.png

3-LAB.png

192 ms

jurlique.png

jurlique.png

193 ms

ahava.png

ahava.png

194 ms

dark-quote.png

dark-quote.png

284 ms

light-quote.png

light-quote.png

283 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

285 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

286 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

287 ms

Avenir-Book.woff

Avenir-Book.woff

288 ms

email.png

email.png

170 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

131 ms

hotjar-140165.js

hotjar-140165.js

184 ms

bat.js

bat.js

188 ms

Avenir-Light.woff

Avenir-Light.woff

125 ms

Didot-HTF-B42-Bold-Ital.woff

Didot-HTF-B42-Bold-Ital.woff

124 ms

Avenir-Medium.woff

Avenir-Medium.woff

121 ms

Didot-HTF-M06-Medium-Ital.woff

Didot-HTF-M06-Medium-Ital.woff

121 ms

beautydna-icons.ttf

beautydna-icons.ttf

119 ms

logo_footer.png

logo_footer.png

117 ms

collect

collect

40 ms

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

51 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

54 ms

SEO Factors

beautydna.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautydna.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Beautydna.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautydna.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautydna. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: